首页> 外文OA文献 >Hospice Use and Pain Management in Elderly Nursing Home Residents With Cancer
【2h】

Hospice Use and Pain Management in Elderly Nursing Home Residents With Cancer

机译:老年护理院居民癌症的临终关怀使用和疼痛管理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

CONTEXT: Pain management is suboptimal in nursing homes.OBJECTIVES: To estimate the extent to which receipt of hospice in nursing homes (NHs) increases the receipt of pain management for residents with cancer at the end of life.METHODS: Study participants included Medicare beneficiaries with cancer who were NH residents in the last 90 days of life in 2011-2012 (n = 78,160). Residents in pain on hospice were matched to like residents without hospice by facility, type of pain assessment (self-report/staff assessment), and weeks until death (9064 matched strata, 16,968 unique residents). Minimum Data Set 3.0 provided information on residents\u27 pain prevalence and receipt of pain management (scheduled analgesics, as needed [pro re nata {PRN}] medication, nonpharmacologic interventions). We developed conditional logistic models to estimate the association between hospice use and pain management, stratified by self-reported and staff-assessed pain.RESULTS: We found that pain prevalence was higher in residents using hospice versus those without hospice (e.g., residents who self-reported pain: hospice: 59.9%, 95% CIs = 59.3%-60.5%; nonhospice: 50.0%, 95% CI = 49.4%-50.6%). In matched analyses, untreated pain was uncommon (self-reported pain: 2.9% and 5.6% in hospice users and nonusers, respectively). Hospice use was associated with receipt of scheduled analgesics (self-reported: adjusted odds ratio = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.73-1.971) and PRN medication (self-reported: adjusted odds ratio = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.20-1.43). Pain prevalence and the association between hospice and pain management were similar in residents with staff-assessed pain.CONCLUSION: Untreated pain at the end of life among residents with cancer in NHs is unusual. Hospice is associated with increased pain management among those with documented pain.
机译:背景:疼痛护理在疗养院中不是最佳的。目的:评估在临终关怀中接受临终关怀在多大程度上增加癌症患者临终时疼痛管理的接受度方法:研究参与者包括医疗保险受益人在2011年至2012年生命的最后90天内患有NH居民的癌症患者(n = 78,160)。根据设施,疼痛评估的类型(自我报告/员工评估)和直到死亡的几周(9064个匹配阶层,16,968位独特居民),将因临终关怀而痛苦的居民与没有临终关怀的居民进行匹配。最低数据集3.0提供了有关居民疼痛发生率和疼痛管理接收情况的信息(计划的镇痛药,根据需要[治疗[PRN]]药物,非药物干预措施)。我们开发了条件逻辑模型来估计临终关怀的使用与疼痛管理之间的关联性,并根据自我报告的和员工评估的疼痛进行分层。结果:我们发现,使用临终关怀的居民的疼痛发生率高于没有临终关怀的居民(例如,自我治疗的居民) -报告的疼痛:临终关怀:59.9%,95%CI = 59.3%-60.5%;非临终关怀:50.0%,95%CI = 49.4%-50.6%)。在匹配的分析中,未经治疗的疼痛并不常见(自我报告的疼痛:临终关怀使用者和非临终使用者分别为2.9%和5.6%)。临终关怀的使用与接受预定的镇痛药有关(自我报告:调整后的优势比= 1.85,95%CI = 1.73-1.971)和PRN药物(自我报告:调整后的优势比= 1.31,95%CI = 1.20-1.43) 。在工作人员评估的疼痛患者中,疼痛发生率以及临终关怀和疼痛管理之间的相关性相似。结论:NHs癌症患者生命终了时未经治疗的疼痛是罕见的。临终关怀与已记录疼痛的患者中疼痛控制的增加有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号